People complain that Clarence Thomas changes law, to do things you don’t like. But you never dispute the underlying beliefs, that make Thomas think he’s doing the right thing. Justices tell you their crazy economic beliefs right in their opinions, …
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Trump v. Slaughter shows how crazy and demented popular legal thought has become. It shows the dangers of giving government over to fleeting contemporary whims and cults. By the President not only inventing a …
A CULT OF LEGAL ACADEMICS USURPS CONGRESS IN TRUMP V. SLAUGHTER Read more »
Justice Clarence Thomas is a luddite Marxist. Thomas is like on of those weirdo college professors who thinks corporations shouldn’t exist. Thomas interjected his primitive Marxist impulses into a recent decision (Hunter v. United States), by saying: “I disagree with …
Would it be possible for political parties to hold formal trials of what elected officials actually do? Rather than just see who can lie the loudest on Twitter all day? If formal process works better than pitchfork mobs to decide …
Non-Government Formal Procedure – The Form of Democracy that Isn’t Used and Why Read more »
I have to talk about a fraudulent article in Nature magazine, which promotes religious propaganda. The article talks about how innocent people often go to prison based on police having eyewitnesses point the finger at the wrong person. And not …
I. The Structure of Government in Expanding Societies II. Imposing Social Rather than Systemic Coordination III. Communist Meanings and Terms that Aren’t In the Constitution IV. Whom did Congress give What Power to? V. Why does a Legislature Delegate Powers? …
Communism is an incorrect belief that social processes combined with human goodness, will produce information needed to make decisions, and will result in people making optimal decisions for the benefit of others. The basic idea is if people go hungry …
The basic question in Trump v. CASA is can a court enjoin the government from just grabbing everyone off the street without even an accusation, and just make them all file habeas petitions? Or is it up to the voters …
In her book “Justice Abandoned”, Rachel Barkow makes the following statement: “The real check on pretrial detention should not be coming from politics but from the Supreme Court enforcing the Constitution.” The word “should” implies there is a reason why …
Rachel Barkow’s book “Justice Abandoned” is another tragedy of someone who will have zero effect, for being wrong in basic assumptions. This includes 1) a misguided marketing appeal to people’s taste for liberty, 2) calling executive-branch discretion “efficient” while arguing …