In Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, Justice Antonin Scalia said it’s up to politics to make sure common interests are served. By using social influence to make sure government employees enforce previously-passed laws (“the impact on plaintiff is plainly undifferentiated …
Justice Scalia Creates a “Parchment Guarantee” in Lujan Read more »
Antonin Scalia didn’t like the independent counsel statute (1978 Ethics in Government Act) as a policy (or maybe as a specific case). In reality he doesn’t like it because it interferes with the operation of his hallucinated collective mind (which …
V. The Demented Communist Mind of Antonin Scalia Read more »
Antonin Scalia tricked everyone (including himself), by not directly saying what he was wrong about. And by hiding it beyond all kinds of crap which Scalia and other people so much wanted to believe he was smart enough to be …
How a Communist Idiot Antonin Scalia was Able to Fool Everyone (Morrison v. Olson) Read more »
A. Law as a Battle Inside a Hallucinated Cartoon Imposed on Reality I. The Deceptive Simplicity of Law Compared to physics, law seems pretty mundane. Like sitting at a restaurant, reading a menu and talking to your friend. You don’t …
AI Prompt: There’s a difference between knowledge, such as how to grow corn, and information, such as how much rain fell here today. Domain knowledge like farming knows patterns. That knowledge is then applied to local information like the precipitation …
Google Gemini on how Thomas Sowell is the Smuggest Marxist in America Read more »
In the United States if you want a nice car, you come up with a money-making scheme and try to save up and buy a car. In the USSR if you wanted a car, you tried to socially and politically …
Why is it that every government office wants to expand their power, except courts. Courts alone claim to be good stewards of the taxpayers’ money, and censors of their own power. The short answer is they’re lying. It’s propaganda. So …
A cop recently used a computer to find a person whose face looked similar to a crime perpetrator captured on video. And then asked an eyewitness if the person he found looked like the suspect. Of course the eyewitness said …
WHERE DOES EYEWITNESS MISIDENTIFICATION OF SUSPECTS HAPPEN? Read more »
It’s no coincidence that the word “interest” consumed US case law around when “Soylent Green” was in theaters. Once you assume government employees are an all-knowing mind with the vision to solve any problem, the only question left is whether …
Soylent Green, the Flaw of “Strict Scrutiny”, and “interest” versus “capability” Read more »
The legal system’s insistence that jury evaluation of witness credibility is an act of lay “common sense” creates a profound structural blind spot. By reducing witness assessment to reading facial expressions and demeanor, court doctrine transforms a complex evaluation of …